I may post fiction of mine or something I like. I may post videos or whatever. Anything I potentially like will be here.


Photo

Aug 30, 2014
@ 6:54 pm
Permalink
143 notes

wolfpuke:

mentalalchemy:

I love it ‘cus this is a wedding cake 

So awesome

wolfpuke:

mentalalchemy:

I love it ‘cus this is a wedding cake

So awesome

(Source: my-whole-other-w0rld, via kissmyasajj)


Photoset

Aug 27, 2014
@ 3:44 pm
Permalink
1,290 notes

actualagentwashingtub:

I don’t know whether to be terrified or turned on.

I was terrified, turned on and hungry…


Photoset

Aug 27, 2014
@ 2:04 pm
Permalink
96,562 notes

0salt:

Deconstructing Masculinity & Manhood with Michael Kimmel @ Dartmouth College

This is an important message on how privilege really works.

(Source: exgynocraticgrrl, via tessaviolet)


Text

Aug 27, 2014
@ 2:01 pm
Permalink
208,658 notes

Reblog if a band has made you a happier person.

(Source: morehandsomeandrugged, via ditavonteesing)


Photo

Aug 24, 2014
@ 5:53 pm
Permalink
46,256 notes

thehpalliance:

If you use YouTube, you need to know this.
You’ve heard all these rumblings about Net Neutrality over the past several months. Let’s get real: this is about controlling online video. It is estimated that by 2017, video content will account for 80-90% of all global Internet traffic.
This isn’t just about not being able to binge-watch a series on Netflix. It’s about the future of online video as we know it.
Whether your YouTube channel is home to daily vlogs, short films, or just that one video from when the cinnamon challenge seemed like a good idea, you’re a video creator. Your content and comments help shape this community. Let’s keep it that way.
Net Neutrality means that your YouTube videos reach people at the same speed as clips from last night’s episode of the Tonight Show. It means a level playing field for video creators looking to reach an audience. But new Net Neutrality rules could mess that up.
Here’s the deal: Telecommunications companies already charge us to access the Internet through our homes and our phones. New FCC rules could allow them to also charge content providers (like YouTube, Netflix, and even PBS) for access to our eyeballs. It could create a fast lane for Jimmy Fallon’s clips, and slow lane for your YouTube videos.
It is really important that the FCC understands that online video creators care about Net Neutrality. Even if you’ve only ever uploaded ONE VIDEO, you are a creator and you have a voice.
If you can, please add your channel to our petition. We’ll deliver this to the FCC in September and demonstrate that the online video community cares about this issue. 
Sign the petition, then spread the word.

thehpalliance:

If you use YouTube, you need to know this.

You’ve heard all these rumblings about Net Neutrality over the past several months. Let’s get real: this is about controlling online video. It is estimated that by 2017, video content will account for 80-90% of all global Internet traffic.

This isn’t just about not being able to binge-watch a series on Netflix. It’s about the future of online video as we know it.

Whether your YouTube channel is home to daily vlogs, short films, or just that one video from when the cinnamon challenge seemed like a good idea, you’re a video creator. Your content and comments help shape this community. Let’s keep it that way.

Net Neutrality means that your YouTube videos reach people at the same speed as clips from last night’s episode of the Tonight Show. It means a level playing field for video creators looking to reach an audience. But new Net Neutrality rules could mess that up.

Here’s the deal: Telecommunications companies already charge us to access the Internet through our homes and our phones. New FCC rules could allow them to also charge content providers (like YouTube, Netflix, and even PBS) for access to our eyeballs. It could create a fast lane for Jimmy Fallon’s clips, and slow lane for your YouTube videos.

It is really important that the FCC understands that online video creators care about Net Neutrality. Even if you’ve only ever uploaded ONE VIDEO, you are a creator and you have a voice.

If you can, please add your channel to our petition. We’ll deliver this to the FCC in September and demonstrate that the online video community cares about this issue.

Sign the petition, then spread the word.

(via ndib)


Photoset

Aug 22, 2014
@ 11:07 pm
Permalink
72,054 notes

the-goddamazon:

fuckyeahbiguys:

"I’m sick of how bisexuality is erased in LGBT spaces. I get really nervous before any LGBT event, especially Pride. I feel incredibly sad and hopeless when gay and lesbian people call me insulting names. If gay and lesbian people don’t understand me – Continue reading Prejudice at Pride at Empathize This

This just punched me in the heart.

(via hssanya)


Photoset

Aug 22, 2014
@ 9:20 pm
Permalink
22,809 notes

You’re wrong about me.

(Source: bvshops, via thewintersoldiersbutt)


Photoset

Aug 22, 2014
@ 9:20 pm
Permalink
2,101 notes

Finally, someone who speaks English.

(Source: bannerstark, via thewintersoldiersbutt)


Photoset

Aug 21, 2014
@ 2:22 pm
Permalink
28,982 notes

childrenmilk:

I thought I’d make a post summarizing Taylor Swifts video “Shake It Off” for the people who don’t want to give her more hate views on VEVO. Maybe instead of giving her 4,000 angry views on youtube we can just give her my one view and reblog this hella so no one else watches it out of irritable curiosity? 

Anyways the video is basically just her dancing singing an anthem that every White person appropriating another culture says, “The haters gonna hate.” There’s no real content or plot to the video, just a lot of dance shots where she’s being really awkward. It’s actually amazing how someone could really pretend to be so innocent and naive yet still convey a very harmful message.

Above I posted some screen caps of the video and after only watching it once I got all I needed to know.  Already from the beginning of the video you see a hard clash between the dancers. There are the prima ballerina types who are all white women, elegantly leaping and stretching and dancing. Then there are the faceless black women who are shaking their asses. Yes, faceless, literally every shot of the “twerkers” are only their asses. There’s also other groups of dancers which include some break dancers (which are all brown men,) and contemporary dancers (which is a group of white people and one girl with an afro.) Oh, yes, I forgot the cheerleading group which was all white cheerleaders and one black girl in the back. I just find it hard to believe that they couldn’t have a solid mixed group of people in each category. She pulled a Miley and Iggy and probably said something like “Well I want a more urban feel! But keep the safe ballerinas white!!” Literally the only group that had a saturation of black women was the twerking group. She even had them squat and shake their asses while she crawled through their legs! So edgy! So urban!

This is the problem I have with Taylor Swift. She’s always trying to convey herself as the innocent one who is “man worthy” (as if being man worthy is even important) while slut shaming other women for being sexual, or even just dressing in “short skirts” and “high heels.” All of the sudden now she wants to say, “To hell with the haters I can have as many problematic exes as I want! Now I’m going to be single and edgy! I’m going to shake it off! And to be single and edgy and sexual I have to dance with a bunch of ass shaking black women!  USE A BUNCH OF BLACK WOMEN AS PROPS

Long story story, Taylor Swift is not only a slut shaming misogynist, she’s ignorant and has obviously racist/stereotypical views of brown and black people. 

(via ditavonteesing)


Video

Aug 20, 2014
@ 6:01 pm
Permalink
29,367 notes

goto-blog:

#Programming in movies vs. programming in real life

(Source: vine.co, via kissmyasajj)


Photoset

Aug 20, 2014
@ 5:54 pm
Permalink
1,311 notes

shinrajunkie:

Here is my latest cosplay of Genderbent tifa as requested By many of you guys :) taken by the Bourgeoisie Brigade cosplay

(via ndib)


Photoset

Aug 20, 2014
@ 5:53 pm
Permalink
181,735 notes

merryweatherblue:

I took my little brother (who falls on the autism spectrum) to see Guardians of the Galaxy and after this scene he lit up like a Christmas tree and screamed “He’s like me! He can’t do metaphors!” And for the rest of the film my brother stared at Drax in a state of rapture. 

So for the last 6 days I have heard my brother repeatedly quote all of the Drax lines from the movie verbatim (one of his talents), begin studying vocabulary test words, and tell everyone he knows that people with autism can also be superheroes.

Now I am not saying that Drax the Destroyer is, or was ever, intended to be autistic. All I am saying is that it warmed my heart to see my brother have an opportunity to identify himself with a character known for his strength, badassness, and honor. And that is pretty damn awesome. 

So while I adored Guardians of the Galaxy as a great fun loving film with cool characters I can do nothing but thank Marvel Studios and Dave Bautista for finally bringing a superhero to the screen that my little brother can relate to.

(via ndib)


Link

Aug 19, 2014
@ 6:30 pm
Permalink
158,971 notes

IF YOUR ART GETS STOLEN »

rene-art:

harrypopsz:

jolly-godoflies:

https://www.tumblr.com/dmca
Go there, and do as the instructions say.
When my art was stolen, I got the post reported, and it was taken down. Don’t worry, it doesn’t just take down the sources post, but it takes down all the reblogged…

(Source: mcshorti)


Video

Aug 16, 2014
@ 2:55 pm
Permalink
2,263 notes

dankflamemaster420:

I want you guys to experience the best anime dub of our time

…wut!? I don’t even…

(Source: 1-420-666-6969, via saimyosho)


Photoset

Aug 16, 2014
@ 2:37 am
Permalink
838,091 notes

spoken-not-written:

THIS IS THE GREATEST THING I HAVE EVER SEEN IN MY ENTIRE LIFE

(Source: oestranhomundodek, via princesstucker)